In September 2020, the world of international diplomacy was abuzz. The news that then-Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu nominated Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize sent ripples through global capitals. It was a move praised by supporters as long overdue and criticized by opponents as a purely political gesture. But what was the real story behind this high-profile endorsement?
The nomination wasn’t a spontaneous decision. It was the culmination of years of a unique political alliance and, more specifically, the result of a groundbreaking diplomatic achievement: the Abraham Accords. This article delves into the core reasons behind the nomination, exploring the strategic thinking, personal dynamics, and regional shifts that prompted this historic moment.
The Crown Jewel: Forging Peace with the Abraham Accords
The single most important reason for the nomination was the successful negotiation of the Abraham Accords. These historic US-brokered agreements fundamentally altered the landscape of the Middle East, achieving something many thought impossible for decades.
For the first time in over 25 years, Arab nations agreed to normalize relations with Israel. The United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Bahrain led the way, signing declarations of peace, cooperation, and diplomatic relations. This was a monumental shift away from the long-standing consensus that peace with Israel was contingent on first resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The success of these deals was the primary justification when Netanyahu nominated Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize.
Key Achievements of the Abraham Accords:
- Diplomatic Breakthrough: The Accords established full diplomatic ties, including opening embassies and exchanging ambassadors between Israel, the UAE, and Bahrain.
- Economic Cooperation: They unlocked billions of dollars in potential trade and investment in sectors like technology, healthcare, tourism, and energy.
- A New Peace Paradigm: The agreements proved that an “outside-in” approach—building relationships with other Arab states to foster a climate for broader regional peace—was a viable strategy.
- Regional Security: The Accords helped create a strategic alignment of nations concerned about regional instability, particularly the influence of Iran.
The Trump administration, led by figures like Jared Kushner and Avi Berkowitz, was the driving force behind these negotiations. They facilitated the talks and provided the diplomatic muscle needed to get the deals across the finish line. From Netanyahu’s perspective, this was a tangible foreign policy victory that deserved the highest international recognition.
A Strategic Alliance: The Netanyahu-Trump Relationship
Beyond any single policy, the nomination was also a reflection of the exceptionally close and symbiotic relationship between Benjamin Netanyahu and Donald Trump. Their political ideologies and leadership styles often aligned, creating a powerful partnership that reshaped US policy in the Middle East.
During his term, President Trump made several key decisions that were strongly supported by Netanyahu’s government and were seen as historic wins for Israel. These actions built a deep well of political goodwill.
Pivotal US Policy Shifts Under Trump:
- Moving the US Embassy: In 2018, the Trump administration officially recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and moved the US embassy there, fulfilling a long-standing promise that previous presidents had deferred.
- Golan Heights Recognition: In 2019, the US formally recognized Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights, a strategic plateau captured from Syria in the 1967 Six-Day War.
- Withdrawing from the Iran Nuclear Deal: A cornerstone of Trump’s Middle East policy was his 2018 withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), a move Netanyahu had lobbied for intensely.
This consistent support on issues critical to Netanyahu’s political platform created a strong sense of reciprocity. The decision when Netanyahu nominated Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize was, in part, a powerful acknowledgment of this unwavering alliance and a thank you for these policy victories.
The Geopolitical Chessboard: Reshaping Middle East Dynamics
The nomination and the Abraham Accords must be understood within the broader context of a changing Middle East. The region was, and still is, grappling with complex power dynamics, and the Accords represented a strategic masterstroke for several leaders.
A United Front Against Iran
A primary motivator for the Accords was the shared concern over Iran’s regional ambitions. Both Israel and Sunni Gulf states like the UAE and Bahrain view Iran as a major threat. The Trump administration’s “maximum pressure” campaign against Tehran resonated with these leaders. The Abraham Accords formalized a de facto strategic alignment, creating a coalition of nations dedicated to countering Iranian influence. Therefore, the successful formation of this front is another core reason why Netanyahu nominated Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize.
Moving Beyond the Palestinian Issue
For decades, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict was seen as the central issue that had to be solved before any broader peace could be achieved. The long-standing formula was “land for peace,” which presupposed an Israeli withdrawal from occupied territories in exchange for peace with the Arab world. The Abraham Accords flipped this script. By normalizing relations without a resolution to the Palestinian conflict, the Accords demonstrated that peace was possible on other terms. This validated a strategic goal Netanyahu had pursued for years, making the recognition of its architect a logical step.
The Politics of the Nomination: A Calculated Move
While the diplomatic achievements were real, it’s impossible to ignore the political calculations at play. The timing of the nomination—just weeks before the 2020 US presidential election—was hardly a coincidence.
For Trump, the endorsement from a key ally on the world stage for a Nobel Peace Prize was a significant political asset, burnishing his credentials as a statesman and dealmaker. For Netanyahu, it was a way to highlight his own influence and successful diplomatic strategy to his domestic audience. It reinforced his image as a leader who could deliver on security and forge historic alliances. This mutual benefit underscores the political savvy behind the moment Netanyahu nominated Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize.
Was the Nomination Justified?
Debate over the nomination was fierce. Supporters argued that a tangible peace agreement that broke a 25-year stalemate is precisely what the Nobel Peace Prize was created to honor. They pointed out that previous US presidents had won for far less concrete achievements. The fact that Netanyahu nominated Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize was, in their view, based on merit and a historic accomplishment that made the region safer.
Conversely, critics argued that Trump’s divisive rhetoric, withdrawal from international agreements like the Paris Climate Accord and the Iran deal, and the unresolved Israeli-Palestinian conflict made him an unsuitable candidate. They viewed the nomination as a purely transactional gesture between two political allies. However, it’s worth noting that Trump was also nominated by other world leaders, including a member of the Norwegian parliament, for the same role in brokering the Abraham Accords.
Conclusion: A Legacy of Disruption and Diplomacy
Ultimately, the story of why Netanyahu nominated Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize is a complex tale of strategy, personal chemistry, and a radical reshaping of Middle Eastern politics. The nomination was anchored in the undeniable success of the Abraham Accords, a diplomatic breakthrough that defied decades of conventional wisdom.
It was also a product of a tight political alliance, a shared strategic vision for countering Iran, and savvy political timing. While Donald Trump did not win the prize, the nomination itself cemented the legacy of the Abraham Accords as one of the most significant diplomatic events of the 21st century—a legacy forged by two of its most disruptive and influential leaders.
“`
